What is it about human sciences and natural sciences that makes them Essay

What is it about humans sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing - Essay ExampleThere argon a number of theories in human sciences and natural sciences that have gained the consensus of a vast majority of critics, and thus have been found convincing. A lot of technical advancements that have been made in the past few centuries argon based on the very theories of natural sciences. Likewise, theories in human sciences have led to the emergence of models of psychological therapy. Most of the factors that make theories in human sciences convincing differ from the factors which make the theories in natural sciences convincing, and yet there are certain factors that romp a role in making the theories in both the fields convincing. This paper discusses the factors responsible for the convincingness of human sciences and natural sciences.Human sciences, as the name indicates, are the sciences about humans. These include the study of sociology, psychology and behavior of hu mans. There is no objective way to test the theories of human sciences. There is a lot of subjectivity in the arguments made with the theories of human sciences, which can fundamentally be attributed to the diversity of human nature. There is probably, nothing as diverse in this universe, as human nature. While the theories of natural sciences can generally be easily tested for their reliability using the scientific methods, it is not quite as easy to necessitate such tests on humans. There is a whole range of factors that play a role in it. The first and the foremost factor that keeps such tests to be performed is the fact that the subjects upon which the test is to be conducted are humans. Humans are living beings in which capacity, they have certain rights which may never be violated. This increases the difficulty for the researchers to overture the subjects of research and gain their consent for participation. The second factor which plays a role in making the testing insuffi cient to test a theory is the simmpleness of imitation. In order to compare the results